Godrej Verano, Sector 63A: What the RERA Filing’s Cost Breakdown and Pending Approvals Reveal (September 2026)

Godrej Verano, the Godrej Properties residential scheme on Golf Course Extension Road in Sector 63A, Gurugram, has already been through two rounds of coverage on this site: one confirming its Haryana RERA registration, another checking Godrej’s own Gurgaon delivery record. Both looked at the registration certificate’s headline numbers — land parcel, unit count, completion date. Neither opened the full RERA filing itself.

This piece does. Form REP-I, the primary registration document Godrej Properties submitted to HRERA Gurugram under Temp Project ID RERA-GRG-PROJ-2274-2026, contains a full cost breakup, a facility-by-facility services table, a construction timeline, and a statutory-approvals checklist. Gurgaon Floors read that filing directly on haryanarera.gov.in. What it shows is more useful — and more mixed — than the registration certificate alone: a precisely budgeted ₹2,935.78 crore project, a construction start date that per the filing has already arrived, and three statutory approvals, including the fire scheme, still shown as applied-for rather than granted.

Quick Project Snapshot

What the Cost Breakup in the Filing Actually Shows

Part-C of Form REP-I requires developers to state an estimated project cost broken into four heads. For Godrej Verano, the filing lists a total estimated project cost of ₹293,577.92 lakh — approximately ₹2,935.78 crore — split as follows: land cost of ₹103,563.20 lakh (~₹1,035.63 crore), construction of apartments at ₹153,272.17 lakh (~₹1,532.72 crore), infrastructure and other structures at ₹13,435.55 lakh (~₹134.36 crore), and other costs — External Development Charges, taxes, levies and similar — at ₹23,307.00 lakh (~₹233.07 crore). These four figures were read directly off the filing on haryanarera.gov.in; they are not estimates or media figures.

Two things stand out. First, land cost alone (~₹1,035.63 crore) works out to roughly 35% of the total estimated project cost — a reasonable, unremarkable share for a Golf Course Extension Road parcel bought outright. Second, the apartment-construction head (~₹1,532.72 crore) is more than double the combined infrastructure-and-other-structures line (~₹134.36 crore), which is consistent with a project still in its shell-and-core planning stage rather than one with detailed amenity build-outs already costed.

A Construction Start Date the Filing Says Has Already Arrived

Form REP-I asks new projects to state a likely construction start date and a likely completion date. Godrej’s filing lists 1 September 2026 as the likely start of construction and 31 August 2033 as the likely completion date. As of this article’s publication, that start date has already passed by the filing’s own timeline — which is a useful, verifiable checkpoint for anyone tracking the project rather than taking a broker’s word for where it stands. It is worth noting that this Part-C “likely completion” field (31 August 2033) is a separate data point from the registered-phase completion date of 2 June 2033 that appears elsewhere on the certificate and was verified in Gurgaon Floors’ earlier coverage of this project; RERA filings can carry more than one date field, and the certificate’s registered completion date is the one that carries legal weight for buyer agreements, not the narrative Part-C estimate.

Statutory Approvals: What’s Obtained, What’s Still Pending

The filing’s approvals record is the most concrete new finding here. Godrej Verano’s license (No. 129 of 2025, dated 23 July 2025) is in place, and external-service NOCs for water supply, electricity and sewage disposal — from GMDA and DHVBN respectively — are marked as obtained. Environment Clearance is recorded as obtained on 30 June 2026, and Forest NOC on 14 May 2026. Zoning, building, site, floor, apartment and elevation plans are all marked approved.

Three approvals that matter directly to a buyer’s safety and utility timeline, however, are recorded as applied for but not yet received: the Fire Scheme Approval (applied 25 July 2026), the Service Plan and Estimate Approval (applied 20 July 2026), and the Approval of the Electrification Plan (applied 17 July 2026). None of these had come through as of the filing data reviewed for this article. Separately, the project’s Layout Plan is marked as not yet approved, even though the more granular building- and floor-level plans are.

None of this means the project is troubled — pending fire and electrification approvals at this stage of a large, multi-tower launch are common, and RERA registration is legally permitted to proceed alongside them. But it is a materially different picture from “RERA approved, fully cleared,” and it is the kind of gap a buyer’s advocate, not a broker’s brochure, is likelier to flag.

What the Filing Says About In-Project Facilities

The services-and-facilities table in Part-C lists cost estimates for everything from internal roads (₹884.16 lakh) to street lighting (₹150 lakh) to fire fighting and security (₹799.94 lakh). Several facility lines, however, are marked “yet to be prepared” with no cost yet assigned: the electricity supply system, a club house/community centre facility line specifically, the shopping area, a school, and a hospital/dispensary. A separate “Community Centre” line elsewhere in the same table does carry a substantial budget of ₹6,006.12 lakh (~₹60.06 crore), which suggests the clubhouse concept itself is budgeted at a project level even as the specific facility-plan line for it remains unprepared in this filing snapshot. Buyers evaluating the amenity-heavy marketing built around this project — multiple clubs, sports and social zones — should treat the specific design and cost detail as still in progress rather than finalised, based on what the filing itself discloses.

Location and Competitive Positioning

Sector 63A sits on Golf Course Extension Road, within reach of Sohna Road, the Southern Peripheral Road and NH-48 — a stretch that has drawn a cluster of ultra-luxury launches over the past two years. TARC Ishva and Sobha Crescent sit in the same immediate corridor, and DLF’s senior-living-oriented project is being marketed a short distance away. That density is a double-edged fact for a Verano buyer: strong long-term infrastructure investment in the belt, but also several developers marketing to the same buyer pool over a similar timeframe, with each project at a different stage of its own approvals and construction cycle. A useful due-diligence habit for anyone comparing this corridor is to check each project’s own filing rather than assume that “RERA registered” means the same thing for all of them — as this article shows, it doesn’t, once you look past the certificate.

Verified vs. Unverified: A Straight Comparison

Who Should Consider It

Buyers who want exposure to a large, listed developer’s project in the Golf Course Extension Road corridor, who are comfortable underwriting a completion horizon in the early 2030s regardless of which exact filing date applies, and who are willing to wait for the fire, electrification and service-plan approvals to clear and for Godrej’s own pricing and floor-plan release before committing capital, rather than acting on broker-stage numbers.

Who Should Not

Buyers who need documented confirmation that fire safety and electrification approvals are fully in place before considering a booking; anyone being pressured to “lock in” a unit ahead of Godrej’s own official pricing and launch announcement; and anyone comparing this project purely on amenity claims that the filing itself shows are still partly unprepared at the facility-design level.

Risks and What to Verify Before Booking

The most concrete, filing-based risk is the gap between a project that is RERA-registered and licensed and one that has all its construction-adjacent statutory approvals in hand: fire, electrification and service-plan sign-offs were still pending as of the data reviewed for this article, and a buyer should ask directly, in writing, for updated approval status before booking. A second, genuine uncertainty is the difference between the filing’s own two completion-related date fields (2 June 2033 on the registered certificate versus 31 August 2033 in the Part-C narrative estimate) — this article could not fully reconcile which figure Godrej intends to carry into buyer agreements, and that ambiguity is worth raising directly with the sales team rather than assuming either date is final. Finally, this article’s own direct reading of the primary filing concentrated on the cost, land and construction-timeline sections; the specific approval-status rows for fire, electrification and service plan were cross-checked against a RERA aggregator that mirrors the same HRERA record rather than re-derived independently line by line from the raw filing text, and readers who want the fullest possible confidence should pull the current filing themselves from haryanarera.gov.in before relying on this detail for a financial decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the total project cost of Godrej Verano per its RERA filing?

₹293,577.92 lakh, or approximately ₹2,935.78 crore, as stated in Form REP-I: land cost ~₹1,035.63 crore, apartment construction ~₹1,532.72 crore, infrastructure and other structures ~₹134.36 crore, and other costs (EDC/taxes/levies) ~₹233.07 crore.

Has Godrej Verano’s fire safety approval been granted?

Not as of the filing data reviewed for this article. The Fire Scheme Approval was shown as applied for on 25 July 2026 but not yet received.

When does the RERA filing say construction will start?

The filing lists a likely construction start date of 1 September 2026, a date that has already arrived as of this article’s publication.

What is the possession or completion date for Godrej Verano?

The filing contains two related but distinct figures: a registered-phase completion date of 2 June 2033 on the certificate, and a “likely completion” estimate of 31 August 2033 in the Part-C project narrative. Buyers should confirm with Godrej directly which date governs their specific buyer agreement.

How much land does Godrej Verano sit on?

The registered phase covers 9.65325 acres, out of a total licensed land parcel of 11.35625 acres, per the filing.

Are the clubhouse and other amenities fully designed and costed?

Partly. A “Community Centre” cost line of roughly ₹60.06 crore appears in the filing’s services table, but a separate club house/community centre facility line, along with the shopping area, school and hospital/dispensary lines, are marked “yet to be prepared” with no cost yet assigned.

Is Godrej Verano’s price list official yet?

No. Configuration, unit-size and pricing figures circulating in the market (3/4/5 BHK, ~2,150–3,900 sq ft, from around ₹5.9 crore) are broker- and portal-sourced and were not found in the filing sections reviewed for this article or in any Godrej release.

Where can I check this filing myself?

Search Temp Project ID RERA-GRG-PROJ-2274-2026, or registered project ID RERA-GRG-2274-2026, on haryanarera.gov.in.

Conclusion

Godrej Verano’s RERA filing confirms a precisely costed, ₹2,935.78 crore project on a legally licensed Sector 63A parcel, with most external-service and building-level approvals already in hand. It also shows, in the same document, that fire safety, electrification and service-plan approvals were still pending as of the data reviewed, and that some of the amenity detail driving the project’s marketing is not yet finalised at the facility-design level. Both things are true at once, and a buyer weighing this project against its Golf Course Extension Road neighbours should read the filing itself, not just its headline registration status, before treating either the optimistic or the cautious version of this story as the whole picture.

Gurgaon Floors’ Godrej Properties desk tracks Verano alongside its Sector 63A neighbours as more official detail emerges — reach out for a documented, filing-checked comparison before acting on anything a broker quotes verbally.